In any event, here is Deleuze. His “reversed Platonism” consists of displacing himself within the Platonic series in order to disclose an unexpected facet: division. Plato did not establish a weak separation between the genus “hunter,” “cook,” or “politician,” as the Aristote lians said; neither was he concerned with the particular characteris tics of the species “fisherman” or “one who hunts with snares”, he wished to discover the identity of the true hunter. Who is? and not What is? He searched for the authentic, the pure gold. Instead of sub dividing, selecting, and pursuing a productive seam, he chose among the pretenders and ignored their fixed cadastral properties, he tested them with the strung bow, which eliminates all but one (the nameless one, the nomad). But how does one distinguish the false (the simulators, the “so-called”) from the authentic (the unadulterated and pure)? Certainly not by discovering a law of the true and false (truth is not opposed to error but to false appearances), but by looking above these manifestations to a model, a model so pure that the actual purity of the “pure” resembles it, approximates it, and measures itself against it; a model that exists so forcefully that in its presence they sham vanity of the false copy is immediately reduced to nonexistence. With the abrupt appearance of Ulysses, the eternal husband, the false suitors disappear. Exeunt simulacra. Plato is said to have opposed essence to appearance, a higher world to this world below, the sun of truth to the shadows of the cave (and it becomes our duty to bring essences back into the world, to glorify the world, and to place the sun of truth within man). But Deleuze locates Plato’s singularity in the delicate sorting, in this fine operation that precedes the discovery of essence precisely because it calls upon it, and tries to separate malign simulacra from the masses [peuple] of appearance. Thus it is useless to attempt the reversal of Platonism by reinstating the rights of appearances, ascribing to them solidity and meaning, and bringing them closer to essential forms by lending them a conceptual backbone: these timid creatures should not be encouraged to stand upright. Neither should we attempt to rediscover the supreme and solemn gesture that established, in a single stroke, the inaccessible Idea. Rather, we should welcome the cunning assembly that simulates and clamors at the door. And what will enter, sub merging appearance and breaking its engagement to essence, will be the event; the incorporeal will dissipate the density of matter; a timeless insistence will destroy the circle that imitates eternity; an impenetrable singularity will divest itself of its contamination by purity; the actual semblance of the simulacrum will support the falseness of false appearances. The sophist springs up and challenges Socrates to prove that he is not the illegitimate usurper.
*
To reverse Platonism with Deleuze is to displace oneself insidiously within it, to descend a notch, to descend to its smallest gestures-discreet, but moral - which serve to exclude the simulacrum; it is also to deviate slightly from it, to open the door from either side to the small talk it excluded; it is to initiate another disconnected and divergent series; it is to construct, by way of this small lateral leap, a dethroned para-Platonism. To convert Platonism (a serious task) is to increase its compassion for reality, for the world, and for time. To subvert Platonism is to begin at the top (the vertical dis tance of irony) and to grasp its origin. To pervert Platonism is to search out the smallest details, to descend (with the natural gravita tion of humor) as far as its crop of hair or the dirt under its fingernails-those things that were never hallowed by an idea; it is to discover the decentering it put into effect in order to recenter itself around the Model, the Identical, and the Same; it is the decentering of oneself with respect to Platonism so as to give rise to the play (as with every perversion) of surfaces at its border. Irony rises and subverts; humor falls and perverts. To pervert Plato is to side with the Sophists’ spitefulness, the unmannerly gestures of the Cynics, the arguments of the Stoics, and the fluttering chimeras of Epicurus. It is time to read Diogenes Laertius.
We should be alert to the surface effects in which the Epicurians take such pleasure: emissions proceeding from deep within bodies and rising like the wisps of a fog-interior phantoms that are quickly reabsorbed into other depths by the sense of smell, by the mouth, by the appetites, extremely thin membranes that detach themselves from the surfaces of objects and proceed to impose colors and contours deep within our eyes (floating epiderm, visual idols); phantasms of fear or desire (cloud gods, the adorable face of the beloved, “miserable hope transported by the wind”). It is all this swarming of the impalpable that must be integrated into our thought: we must articulate a philosophy of the phantasm construed not through the intermediary of perception of the image, as being of the order of an originary given but, rather, left to come to light among the surfaces to which it is related, in the reversal that causes every interior to pass to the outside and every exterior to the inside, in the temporal oscillation that al ways makes it precede and follow itself-in short, in what Deleuze would perhaps not allow us to call its “incorporeal materiality.
It is useless, in any case, to seek a more substantial truth behind the phantasm, a truth to which it points as a rather confused sign …
— T H E A T R U M P H I L 0 S O P H I C U M, Michel Foucault (at http://www.generation-online.org/p/fpfoucault5.htm)
Apologies to followers who find Foucault’s rhapsodizing off-putting. I think this essay is a treasure, and I’ve never known of its existence. I have friends who are very taken with Delueze, but I have always found his writings to be overly ornate. (I prefer High Renaissance architecture to Baroque. That should tell you a little about where I stand on these things.) But in this essay, Foucault reminds me of Michelangelo: the bursting forth of a fully ripened genre, spreading the seeds of what is to follow. In doing so, he sharpens my curiosity about Deleuze. Foucault’s joy at showing off is so unrestrained, but at the same time so artful, that I just sit here radiating joy. I’m happy to be alive in a world where people enjoy playing so seriously with ideas.
I had forgotten this til outersystems liked it today. It gives me joy to read it again. Still thrilled.
constantly. all the time, even at NIGHT.
there would be no escape.
this is simply terrifying. how do you erase knowledge please ?
NASA actually recorded the sun, if you want to hear it:
And they recorded the planets too:
so, the sun and the earth sound about how i would’ve expected, and a lot of other planets just make strong wind sounds which is perfectly reasonable but venus sounds like pure dread?!?! WHY IS SATURN SCREAMING?!? pluto isn’t bad and is actually kinda nice but it’s very strange to me too like Why Does It Do That. jupiter is super chill 10/10. pluto and jupiter need to collab i would buy that album
oh,
fuck, guys, you know what this means? it means the ancient world was right about the music of the spheres.
Sun
Mercury
Venus
Earth
Mars
Jupiter
Saturn
Uranus
Neptune
Pluto
i can hear these photos and i don’t like it
Is anyone going to explain why Saturn is basically screaming?
I’m afraid
NASA says…
Saturn’s complex radio spectrum with rising and falling tones, is very similar to Earth’s auroral radio emissions. These structures indicate that there are numerous small radio sources moving along magnetic field lines threading the auroral region.
Time on this recording has been compressed, so that 73 seconds corresponds to 27 minutes. Since the frequencies of these emissions are well above the audio frequency range, we have shifted them downward by a factor of 44.
Long but interesting, on how a group of radical environmentalists occupying a German forest in protest of lignite mining do/use dystopia ‘to criticize the present and to devise strategies for how to prevail in a horrible world.’ https://t.co/eTReA05Evo 🔓
“This collaboration with MF DOOM represents a tipping point for augmented reality, the NFT market, and the ubiquitous digital layer that is a battleground for big tech.”
“This collaboration with MF DOOM represents a tipping point for augmented reality, the NFT market, and the ubiquitous digital layer that is a battleground for big tech.”
Reverse engineered favourite mask, improved fit, added nose wire feature, made triple layer, and used fabric printed using illustrations from our #wasplove game. Just got to weave own fabric next time… pic.twitter.com/exNf2AIluN
This is the occasional reminder that UbuWeb is nor ever was never meant to be a permanent archive; it could disappear at any time. Everything on Ubu is downloadable. Hard drives are cheap. Just sayin’.
“A critique is not a matter of saying that things are not right as they are. It is a matter of pointing out on what kinds of assumptions, what kinds of familiar, unchallenged, unconsidered modes of thought the practices that we accept rest… We must free ourselves from the sacralization of the social as the only reality and stop regarding as superfluous something so essential in human life and human relations as thought.”
–Michel Foucault, “Practicing Criticism,” or “Is it really important to think?” May 30–31, 1981. Didier Eribon interview. In Lawrence Kritzman, Foucault, Politics, Philosophy, Culture. New York and London: Routledge, 1988. p. 155.
Lots of people saying they are tired of the pandemic because it’s stretching on. I’m tired of it because it went from a (kinda) “natural disaster” to an endless loop of individualistic and idiotic behaviour. From boarding up the windows ahead of a storm, to selfish carelessness.
Lots of people saying they are tired of the pandemic because it’s stretching on.
I’m tired of it because it went from a (kinda) “natural disaster” to an endless loop of individualistic and idiotic behaviour. From boarding up the windows ahead of a storm, to selfish carelessness.
“Inspired by the ideal of self-sufficiency developed by the anarchist Pyotr Kropotkin, the German architect Leberecht Migge integrated it into his project of self-sufficient co-operatives. In his pamphlet Jedermann Selbstversorger (Everyone Self-Sufficient, 1918) and his article ‘Das grüne Manifest’ (1919, the first occurrence of the term ‘green’ in a political sense), he developed a political and urbanistic theory based on garden cities that would be self-sufficient thanks to solar and wind power, horticulture and the strict recycling of organic waste. Recycling was the essential lever to escape from the great technological networks of capitalism and establish self-management, ‘the smallest form of government possible – according to the will of the people’.”
— Christophe Bonneuil and Jean-Baptiste Fressoz,
The Shock of the Anthropocene
It is never too early to start talking about outer space labor law
Like even NASA has been guilty of treating astronauts like organic robots in the past (see SkyLab Strike). You really think someone like Elon Musk will care about their employees working in microgravity beyond their ability to continue performing their job?
For example, NASA astronauts are currently required to work out two hours a day to keep up their bone and muscle mass. This helps prevent irreparable damage/loss and lets them eventually return to living their normal lives on Earth. But exercise equipment is heavy, and it costs $10000 per pound when you’re shooting something into orbit. That’s a lot! Can a company be trusted to send enough equipment into space for each of their employees to get that two hours in when the benefit is for the employees after they’ve served their time?
How long will these companies expect their employees to stay in microgravity when it’s cheaper for them to leave a single person up there for a long period of time than to bring them down and switch them out? If someone gets sick or wants to quit?
These are questions and concerns that will
need to be addressed in the near future as the space industry becomes further and further commercialized and companies begin to break away from merely contracting for government space agencies.
In case anyone needs a time zone visualization, I just hacked this one together. It’s pretty, so even though it’s completely trivial, I’m going to share it: https://t.co/Z3lXfMzkbc
In case anyone needs a time zone visualization, I just hacked this one together. It’s pretty, so even though it’s completely trivial, I’m going to share it: https://t.co/Z3lXfMzkbc
6yo: What are you doing? Me: Just some editing. 6yo: What’s that? Me: It’s like writing, but instead of making words you remove them. 6yo: …dewriting? Me: Yes. Yes, that’s it exactly.
I wish people would think about this issue more often. Reproducibility of effects is of no value when your data have no meaningful relationship to the thing you care about
“The central idea of this book is no doubt also its strangest: the notion that beholder and artwork fuse jointly into a third and higher object, with the corollary that this third term is the key to shedding new light on the ontology of art.”
— Harman, Graham.Art and Objects. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2020.
Autechre have created a unique and particular sonic universe, so it’s hard to say what’s best or most representative of their music, and you’ll probably get as many different answers as people you ask. so perhaps a suggested heuristic path…
(note this just covers their albums, so doesn’t include the various EPs. you can think of the EPs from each period as similar, yet distinct. if you find any particular album interesting chances are you’ll like the other material from around the same period)
(i left out the bit where you open a small door and find a Gescom)
Autechre have created a unique and particular sonic universe, so it’s hard to say what’s best or most representative of their music, and you’ll probably get as many different answers as people you ask. so perhaps a suggested heuristic path…
(note this just covers their albums, so doesn’t include the various EPs. you can think of the EPs from each period as similar, yet distinct. if you find any particular album interesting chances are you’ll like the other material from around the same period)
(i left out the bit where you open a small door and find a Gescom)
Someone online asked if there was a guide to integrating Tracery with games, so I wrote one.
Tracery is named for the architectural term “tracery”, the curly filigree part of gothic cathedrals. Tracery doesn’t hold up the cathedrals: it’s decorative not structural. If you find yourself trying to do very complex data storage and conditionals with Tracery, you might be trying to build a cathedral with filigree. It is best to use your game code (javascript or Unity, or whatever else you use) itself to perform complex tasks like these. Tracery is best for adding decoration afterwards. But there are some good techniques for adding Tracery to games that I’ve encountered.
Common uses of Tracery
Games often have abstract rule systems at their core (see Joris Dormans work on modelling games abstractly http://www.jorisdormans.nl/machinations/). But even for games with identical rule systems, content can create flavor and feelings that go far beyond the meaning of rule systems. Ladykiller in a Bind and Hatoful Boyfriend may have very similar mechanical systems driving them, but what wonderfully different experiences we get from their unique content! From flavortext on Magic: the Gathering cards to story arcs and dialogues of dating sims, or the sprawling poetry of Twine games, content can serve many purposes in a game.
Tracery, and other grammar-based templating languages, are already popular in games to create new content. Dietrich Squinkifer uses it in Interruption Junction for an endless stream of dialogue and in Mr. Darcy’s Dance Challenge uses it for endless insults from Mr. Darcy. Pippin Barr uses it to generate thoughtful frowns and headscratches in It is as if you were playing chess.
Beyond Tracery, there are other templating languages, and many game developers have built their own. Zach Johnson, the creator of Kingdom of Loathing invented a templating language to create game content like combat text and hobo-names (https://youtu.e/X3sqkxedSHQ?t=4m6s). Even the original 1966 ELIZA chatbot used templating in its dialogue generator.
Basic Tracery content in a game
These basic content creation tasks are easy for Tracery! Create a grammar “rpgGrammar” (or several, like “weaponGrammar”, “innNameGrammar” etc if you don’t want to share content between grammars) with your writing. Then call
rpgGrammar.flatten("#innName#") or rpgGrammar.flatten("#NPCName#") or rpgGrammar.flatten("#armorDescription#") or rpgGrammar.flatten("#combatSound#")
to generate whatver content you’ve authored.
Generating parseable data
You may find that you want to generate more complex stuff with a single query, such as generating a sword name and a related description like “General Greenblat’s Blade” “a sword found by General Greenblat while searching for her lost puppy”. In that case, you might have a grammar like
"swordWord": ["blade", "edge", "sword"],
"bowWord": ["aim", "bow", "longbow"],
// This picks out whether we are generating a bow or a sword"setWeaponType": ["[weaponClass:sword][weaponNameType:#swordWord#]","[weaponClass:bow][weaponNameType:#bowWord#]"]
"generateWeaponData": "[character:#name#]#setWeaponType##weaponType# | #character#'s #weaponNameType#" | #character# found this #weaponType# when #doingSomeTask#"]
Expanding “#generateWeaponData#” would generate some data separated by “|” symbols, which you could then split apart with Javascript and use separately in your game.
Generating tagged data
I’ve been working on a hipster chef game, HipChef (for waaayyyy too long). It’s been an exercise in figuring out good tagging practices for using Tracery text in a game while also getting meaning out of that text.
For example, here is a sample of my grammar for generating recipes:
"artisanToast": "#bread# with #spice#-spiced #largeFruit# and #meat#"
This might generate some fancy toast descriptions, but in the game, I want to know the game-significant ingredients of this toast. If it has pork and fennel, which are trendy at the moment it scores higher, but if it has duck and melon, which are not, the score is lower. I can search for some ingredients, like “pineapple” by name, but others, like “mint” might be ambiguous. Other queries, like “fowl” or “herb” would need to match many rules.
The fastest way to do this, for me, is to hand-embed these tags inside the content, like kumquat<citrus>. For some content, like herbs and spices, I want to tag all the rules with a single tag. That sounded like work, so I wrote a bit of utility code function autotag(grammar, key, tags) which automatically appends the given tags to all the rules for that key.
Now when the toast generates, it outputs a string like “Ciabatta with turmeric
-sprinkled honeydew
and roast duck
”. I can strip these tags out with JavaScript, and get and array “spice,melon,fowl,game” (which the game’s rules can use) and a string “Ciabatta with turmeric-sprinkled honeydew and rost duck” which I can display to the player.
You can generate any structure of data this way, even JSON (which you can then use JS’s JSON parser to unpack automatically). In fact, the SVG graphics made with Tracery are an example of this: Tracery generates specially structured text, which a web-page can interpret as image-making commands. But SVG and JSON parsers are just two ways to computationally parse text, you can write your own, as I did with HipChef.
Using world state in Tracery
Your game almost certainly has some world state. For an RPG, this might include the player’s occupation and race, their weapon, their health, a list of skills. Like many games, you might also have a custom name for the player. To use the name in Tracery, you can edit the raw grammar before you use it in Tracery or you can edit the grammar on the fly by pushing new rules to the grammar. This is what Tracery does when you use “[myName:#name#]” in a grammar, but now you’re doing it whenever you want, with whatever data you want.
mygrammar.pushRules(playerName, ["Bobo the Love Clown"]);
mygrammar.expand("#playerName# left #playerHometown# on an adventure");
A Note: the newest in-progress version of Tracery allows you to pass a world-object to Tracery along with a grammar, so you no longer have to manually update “playerMood”, etc, each time the player’s mood changes and you want to use it in a piece of generated text. But I don’t have an ETA for that.
Seeds: turning commodities into individuals
You’d often want to generate the same content many times in a game. For example, in a text-version of a space game that can generate trillions of planets for you to visit (cough) you might not want to save all the generated tree descriptions, plant descriptions, alien city names, etc. But, if you use some fixed number to set the random seed, you can be certain that Tracery will make the same sequence of “random” choices when picking rules. This will generate the same content, as long as you ask for the content in the same order once you set the seed. For Javascript, I use David Bau’s excellent fix. Conveniently, this requires no changes to Tracery, it just modifies JS’s random number generator.
This is especially fun if you have some huge number represting an in-game commodity, like the population of your city. You can use the index as your seed: “look at citizen #31992” will set the seed to “31992” and each time, the citizen will be “Margarie Tomlinson, age 45, afraid of spiders”.
Further
This may not be as much as your game needs. You may want internal conditionals controlling the grammar’s expansion, or more direct tagging control, such as “give me a conversation tagged ‘aggressive’ and ‘evasive’”. James Ryan’s Expressionist work can do tag-directed generation management to satisfy constraints, and I’ve heard Emily Short is working on something Tracery-like with tags.
I’m also working to include tags and conditionals in the new Tracery, but we’ll see when that ships. Until then, you may get mileage out of the techniques above.
Using Tracery In Larger Systems
Well, this write-up would have come in handy for NaNoGenMo!
I used some variants of a couple of these for my NaNoGenMo project. For my island description generator, I had rules with tags like:
“<+feature do_not_repeat></+><+feature size=small></+>There were two islands there. The distance from one to the other was about one mile. The small island <feature cliffs>rose very abruptly</+> many hundred feet above the sea. At the top was <+feature landmark>a rock with a conical form, which eternally seems on the point of rolling down with a tremendous crash into the sea</+>. The other island was larger, if less remarkable.”
and
“The #inhabitants# use #a_kind_of# <+feature condiment>#condiment#</+> in their cooking.“
This produced descriptions like:
They saw The Blue Violet Isle of Eurynome directly ahead, rising like a deep blue cloud out of the sea.
It is a very flat place, made up of several low-lying coral atolls.
The pirates were eager to hunt the mole, which they had great expectations for. Whenever they visit this island, sailors will conduct a kind of ritual, which they claim symbolizes deceit. Around the principle harbor, there were a great many papercrete buildings, forming a small town.
The cuisine of that island is known for something that resembles fresh dijon ketchup.
And the text generator had an additional constraint of only allowing new sentences to be added if they matched the already chosen tags. (Some were complementary, while others were mutually exclusive.) The tags surrounded bits of the text, which were added to the information about the island, so a landmark or kind of cuisine could be referred to by other generators.
Like the character description generator:
“Gull” Sao’s favorite food is fresh dijon ketchup from The Blue Violet Isle of Eurynome. She was dressed in a rusty black suit and wore seafoam green yarn stockings and shoes with brass buckles. She wore a red sash tied around her waist, and, as she pushed back her coat, you might glimpse the glitter of a pistol butt.
Having written this stuff once, I immediately see ways in which Kate’s suggestions above would have improved things. I look forward to other people finding new and better ways to apply Tracery to generating more things.
LowDjo & @zzkt NOW on https://t.co/q3Jp2D61H3 Ethereal electronica rumbling bass squelching synths, an astronaut’s last words, Bon mantras, Andouillette, Carnivorous hell & misunderstood machines So laugh, cry or shout in the face of madness. There’s “Nothing like a good cough”
LowDjo & @zzkt NOW on https://t.co/q3Jp2D61H3 Ethereal electronica rumbling bass squelching synths, an astronaut’s last words, Bon mantras, Andouillette, Carnivorous hell & misunderstood machines So laugh, cry or shout in the face of madness. There’s “Nothing like a good cough”
LowDjo & @zzkt NOW on https://t.co/q3Jp2D61H3 Ethereal electronica rumbling bass squelching synths, an astronaut’s last words, Bon mantras, Andouillette, Carnivorous hell & misunderstood machines So laugh, cry or shout in the face of madness. There’s “Nothing like a good cough”
LowDjo & @zzkt NOW on https://t.co/q3Jp2D61H3 Ethereal electronica rumbling bass squelching synths, an astronaut’s last words, Bon mantras, Andouillette, Carnivorous hell & misunderstood machines So laugh, cry or shout in the face of madness. There’s “Nothing like a good cough”
any psychological “disorder” that lists disrespect for authority as a symptom is just a bunch of authoritarians getting mad and making up diseases, sorry
I’ve resisted the retrocomputing rabbit hole thus far, which in very grateful for, but I did just stumbled on some of Bjarne Däcker’s manuals for the 1970s hardware that ran EriPascal (iiuc), a predecessor to Erlang. Imagine a prequel to Erlang The Movie… pic.twitter.com/z2ieS9mfIK
The right has long held that homelessness is a symptom - of a lack of self-control, a lack of foresight, of addiction, mental illness, etc - and therefore the solution to it is training, incarceration, rehab, or rigid discipline.
None of this stuff worked.
For more than a decade, there’s been a more pragmatic approach to homelessness: giving people homes. The housing first movement has repeatedly shown that the best way to make homeless people not homeless is to give. them. a. home.
After all, if you are struggling with addiction, mental illness, etc, or if you eed structure in your life, the chaos of not having a home only makes this a thousand times worse.
(Oh, and giving homeless people homes is MUCH cheaper than treating homelessness as a crime)
In a similar vein, the Foundations for Social Change’s New Leaf Project tried simply giving homeless people money (CAD7500). If the right is correct and homelessness is a moral failing, then this should make everything worse (“they’ll just blow it on drugs”).
So this experiment isn’t just a test of the best way to address homelessness; it’s also a test of whether the right’s frame of homelessness as an individual failing is correct, or whether the left’s conception of homelessness as a system problem is right.
The results are definitive: 18 months on, grant recipients found housing a year earlier than the control group; 70% experienced less food insecurity. Money went to food, clothes and rent, with a 39% decline in spending on booze, drugs and cigarettes.
The randomized, controlled study had 115 subjects aged 19-64, all of whom had experienced homelessness for at least six months. On average, they saved CAD1000 of the initial grant over the 12-month study. Participants spent more on their kids and other family members.
The participants’ 12-month, $7500 cash grants amounted to less than half of what it costs to billet a person in a homeless shelter over the same period.
This is both amazing and obvious. The best cure for homelessness is a home. The best cure for poverty is money.
It’s a very powerful argument for a basic income, too.
But not necessarily for a UNIVERSAL basic income.
Here’s the problem with UBI: imagine two people, one of whom is in the 10% or 1% or 0.1% and has all their needs met every month; the other person does not.
Give each of them $1000/month. The poor person experiences a huge difference in their life: they go from not having their needs met - that is, not having a home or food or utilities - to having them met. This is transformative.
What about the rich person? Well, they put the money in a 401(k) or other tax-advantaged savings.
Fast forward a decade.
10 years later, the poor person still has their needs met. They have better health outcomes, their kids have better educational outcomes. SUCCESS!
The rich person, meanwhile, is A QUARTER MILLION DOLLARS RICHER, thanks to the miracle of compound interest.
We have reduced one of the worst aspects of inequality, but inequality itself remains intact, along with all the toxic, corrosive problems it creates.
The system remains rotten to the core.
Can we get the benefits of UBI while still addressing inequality?
Yes. Basic income remains a no-brainer. The problem is universality. We shouldn’t give subsidies to rich people.
But that doesn’t mean we should do means-testing.
Means-testing is humiliating and cruel. Universal services promote solidarity. Means-tested services are a form of Apartheid.
Imagine if you had to prove your poverty before you could go to a public library, or let your kid play in a public park or attend a public school.
But public parks, schools and libraries are a subsidy to the wealthy. We could insist they use country clubs, private schools and subscription libraries instead.
It’s easy to understand how this ends: wealthy people use their political power to defund the public sphere.
The money they’d lose by having to pay for country clubs and private schools wouldn’t reduce their spending power enough to prevent them from accumulating outsized political power.
To do that, we need to tax them.
That’s what taxes are for: to reduce the private sector’s spending power so that when the government creates new money to fund the programs we need, the new money isn’t competing with the money that’s already in circulation for the same goods, which creates inflation.
Governments, after all, don’t pile up our tax money and then send it out again to pay for programs. When currency-issuing governments tax their citizens, they just annihilate that money. When they pay their citizens to do things like build roads, they create new money.
All the money in circulation is money the government has spent, but hasn’t taxed out of existence All the money you and I have to spend is the government’s deficit. If governments don’t run deficits (if they taxed as much as they spent), there’d be nothing left for us!
Federal taxes don’t pay for programs, but they DO something important. They keep rich people from getting too rich - getting so rich that they can distort our political process.
High tax rates on top wages and wealth solve the UBI vs BI conundrum without cruel means-testing. If you’re rich, you get the UBI, but you lose it at tax-time; just like you get to use the library for free, but we tax away the money you saved by not going to the bookstore.
All of this also reveals the incompleteness of cash transfers. As powerful as this experiment was, it is even more exciting when combined with Housing First (if you think finding a home in a year is a good outcome, imagine how great getting a home TOMORROW will be!).
Likewise other progressive, universal programs like a Federal Job Guarantee, which would set a TRUE minimum wage - the wage every person who wants to work is guaranteed, irrespective of whether anyone in the private sector wants their labor.
Without such a guarantee, the true minimum wage is $0 - the price your labor fetches if no one in the private sector has a job for you.
Such universal programs must be complements to social programs like direct transfers, disability benefits, etc, not replacements for them.
When the current crisis is over we’re going to face a massive unemployment and homelessness crisis. The private sector won’t be able to solve it. The right’s version of fixing this is workfare: Build Trump’s wall or starve.
We need a powerful progressive alternative: grounded in caring, universality, and repairing the Earth. Direct transfers, housing first, and a jobs guarantee are policies that work:
Need money? Here’s money.
Need a home? Here’s a home.
Need a job? Here’s a job.
If those sound expensive to you, consider the unbearable cost of mass poverty, homlessness and unemployment.
The thing is we’re not killing the planet. Planet Earth is 4.4B years old and has seen much worse and yet life recovered. We’re a mere blip. We’re almost nothing. We’re killing our own particular ecological niche in geological time. We’re killing ourselves. That’s very different.
The thing is we’re not killing the planet. Planet Earth is 4.4B years old and has seen much worse and yet life recovered. We’re a mere blip. We’re almost nothing. We’re killing our own particular ecological niche in geological time. We’re killing ourselves. That’s very different.
had a zoom meeting end today by sending people into breakout rooms to sort of simulate chit-chatting on the way out, and it was pretty nice! at least more interesting than the usual awkward wave-n-vanish
had a zoom meeting end today by sending people into breakout rooms to sort of simulate chit-chatting on the way out, and it was pretty nice! at least more interesting than the usual awkward wave-n-vanish
But mind control experiments – done in secret, by people who already convinced themselves of their efficacy – demonstrate the usefulness of the scientific method, with transparency and review by skeptical adversaries.
And mind control is useful in that it helps identify monsters. People who believe in mind control, and are looking to perfect it, are not good people to have around.
“Becoming indigenous to a place means living as if your children’s future mattered, to take care of the land as if our lives, both material and spiritual, depended on it.” Robin Wall Kimmerer (I love this so much)
—Anab Jain (aka. anabjain) Fri Oct 02 14:46:57 +0000 2020
There’s a kind of debugging I call “flailing"—a desperate, theory-less "jiggling the handle” one can stumble into after extended failure. Found myself there today on hour 3 of JS build system BS. In such situations I find Pirsig’s treatise on “gumption traps” a good antidote. pic.twitter.com/76fRzJqbuX
Yeah. Walking. Writing day pages by hand. Wet photography. Astrophotography. Learn to draw. Study calculus. Grow a garden. Anything really that doesn’t involve a screen or algorithms. Ride a bike every morning which is not a sport unless you think of it as such.
“Becoming indigenous to a place means living as if your children’s future mattered, to take care of the land as if our lives, both material and spiritual, depended on it.” Robin Wall Kimmerer (I love this so much)
“The brief span of an individual life is misleading. Each one of us is as old as the entire biological kingdom, and our bloodstreams are tributaries of the great sea of its total memory.” [½]
'Science artisans strive for and explore sovereignty, dignity, and freedom in an age immersed in science and technology controversies by bridging the divides between art, science, engineering, and humanities’ https://t.co/9wrgv2kCM8
‘Science Artisans’ - from @DenisaKera 'Science artisans strive for and explore sovereignty, dignity, and freedom in an age immersed in science and technology controversies by bridging the divides between art, science, engineering, and humanities’
For every automated technological system that isn’t working, there are *also* countless non-automated, by-hand systems working at scale that are *also* failing.
One of the richest veins in temporal-perception research is on the effect of emotion on cognition, and Droit-Volet has conducted a number of compelling studies that explore the relationship. In a recent series of experiments, her subjects viewed a series of images of faces, each of which was neutral or expressed a basic emotion, such as happiness or anger. Each image lasted onscreen for anywhere from 0.4 seconds to 1.6 seconds, and the viewer was asked to say whether the image lasted for a “short” or a “long” time—that is, closer to one of the two standard durations they’d been trained beforehand to recognize. Consistently, viewers reported that happy faces seemed to last longer than neutral ones, and both angry and fearful faces seemed to last longer still.
What would the Arctic be like if the Earth’s spin was perpendicular to its orbit? Instead of a half-year day and a half-year night it would just be perpetual dusk and dawn. Even the creep of a day stretched out over a year indicates time, imagine if it was perpetually out of time, between day and night?
This is not to say that the movie is good or bad! (I am very much not the intended audience.) But I wonder if successful interventions for QAnon believers will look less like “deprogramming,” and more like shifting their conspiracy theorizing to a different, less harmful theory.
Birdfont is a free font editor which lets you create vector graphics and export TTF, OTF and SVG fonts. The editor has good support for both monochrome and color font formats.
